A scientific proof of the existence of God

Is it not true that nobody has tried to even define God in a scientific manner until now and if so — how we may, at all, look for a scientific proof of the existence of God?

Obviously, until and unless we define God in a scientific manner, say, in some such a manner as follows — it would be only a waste of time to find any scientific proof of the existence of God.

Left to me — I would like to define God, as follows.

We may define God as “An entity that may have a brain thousands times more capable than the human brain and may know even the things human beings are forbidden to know”.

Once we may define in such a manner, not one — we may find several proofs of the existence of what is widely known as “God”.

Though I intend to present all such proofs in the form of a book “What may be acknowledged as God by Science”, I am going to tell you about one of the ways how me may prove that some entity of this type is very much supposed to have existed — in this article.

One of the ways — how we may prove the existence of some entity of this nature

Though we know that the human fetus takes about nine months to grow up from scratch to the fully grown-up baby in the uterus of a pregnant woman; does anybody know that nine months is the minimum possible time it may take to let the fetus grow up from scratch to fully grown-up baby.

The fact is, in any way other way than the way in which it grows — it shall take a time longer than nine months.

But the fact is — you can’t know, why it is so unless you know how to calculate the time it may take to grow up into a fully grown-up baby from scratch.

Only an industrial engineer like me can tell you — how to calculate the time such a process may take.

It may be explained only by understanding the way we calculate the time within which we may be able to complete a project by treating even the development of the fetus from scratch to a fully grown-up baby as a project.

We take the help of what are known as “PERT (Abbreviation of “Project Evaluation and Reviewing Technique”) Charts” to calculate the time within which a project may be completed.

If you know how we use this technique — fine!

But if you don’t know — doesn’t matter.

The fact is — we may develop more than one type of PERT Charts to complete any project as I shall explain hereunder to acquaint you with the technique we use to calculate the time within which a project may be completed.

I will take a project of only eight tasks to explain the procedure of calculating the time within which it would be completed.

You can’t understand how difficult it would be to calculate the time the project of development of a fully grown-up baby from scratch at the cell level unless you come to know how tedious the method of calculating the time a project of just nine tasks may take, is.

How we calculate the time within which even a project of nine tasks may be completed

Just look at the following PERT Chart.

The numbers written inside circles are known as “nodes” and various tasks to be performed are coded as “tasks 1–2, 2–3, 2–4, 3–5 and 3–6”, as shown in this chart.

Let us assume that the task 1–2 may be completed in “1 day”; the tasks 2–3 and 2–4 may be individually completed in “2 days”; the tasks 3–5 and 3–6 may be individually completed in “3 days” and likewise — the task 5–8 in “5 days”; the task 6–7 in “6 days” and the task 7–8 in “7 days”.

According to the above chart, this project may reach node “3” in three days, node “5” in six days, and node “8” in 11 days by route 1–2–3–5–8.

Likewise, it may reach the node “4” in three days.

But it would reach the node “6” in six days by the route 1–2–3–6 and in seven days by the route 1–2–4–6.

Task 6–7 may begin only after seven days — not after six days and it would reach node “7” in thirteen days and reach node “8” in 20 days by route 1–2–4–6–7–8.

So we may conclude that this project may be completed in 20 days as per this PERT Chart.

But, now, look at the following PERT Chart.

Let us calculate the time in which — the same project may be completed as per this PERT chart.

It shall reach node “6” in seven days by the route 1–2–4–6 but in nine days by the route 1–3–5–6. As such task “6–7” may begin only after nine days and reach node “8” by the route 1–3–5–6–7–8 in 22 days.

As such this project may be completed in 22 days if it gets executed according to this PERT Chart instead of 20 days.

JUST IMAGINE HOW BIG THE PERT CHARTS MAY INVOLVE THE ASSEMBLY OF AS MANY AS 33 TRILLION CELLS OF AS MANY AS 200 TYPES OF CELLS OF THE HUMAN FETUS FROM SCRATCH — CELL BY CELL.

Such charts may have billions of tasks, implying — billions of nodes.

Just imagine how tough the task of calculating the shortest gestation period for a human fetus to grow from a fertilized female egg to its final stage.

THINK OF THE ENTITY THAT SHOULD HAVE PICKED UP SUCH A PERT CHART THAT SHOULD ENABLE A FERTILIZED EGG TO TAKE THE SHAPE OF A HUMAN BODY IN AS LITTLE TIME AS POSSIBLE.

WOULD SUCH AN ENTITY NOT HAVE A BRAIN THOUSANDS TIMES MORE CAPABLE THAN THE HUMAN BRAIN?

IF SO — IS ANYTHING WRONG IN CALLING SUCH AN ENTITY “GOD”?