Scope of creating a new branch of science
Though nothing seems to be wrong in treating the physically imperceptible things known as “dark matter” and “dark energy” discovered by astronomers as a part of cosmology and astrophysics, the fact is — the realm of physically imperceptible things does not end with the discovery of “dark matter” and “dark energy”.
As is well known, the existence of “dark matter” and “dark energy” has been justified by making the world aware of the phenomena that can’t be explained unless such things exist.
So, should all physically imperceptible entities the existence of which may be justified by describing the phenomena that can’t be explained unless such entities exist, also not form a part of the same realm to which “dark matter” and “dark energy” belong?
On the same pattern, in my book “What May Be Acknowledged As God By Science”, I have described quite a few non-astronomical phenomena that can’t be explained unless such physically imperceptible entities as have been described by me, in this book, also exist.
However, not only should such entities, even the omniscient type of entity without the existence of which the following phenomena can’t be explained, also belong to the same realm to which “dark matter” and “dark energy” belong.
(i) The phenomenon related to the origin of the universe
Is it not true that though the theory of the Big Bang assumes that some extremely hot and dense singularity should have existed before the Big Bang — it is unable to answer the query “Since nothing is expected to have existed before the Big Bang, from where such extremely hot and dense singularity should have arrived?”
It looks as though the entity which should have designed the human brain has designed such a brain that has enabled us to think that the Big Bang should have occurred and some extremely hot and dense singularity should have existed before the Big Bang, but it is not capable of knowing
(i) Who should have created such a singularity?
(ii) How could any entity have created such a singularity?
and
(iii) How did the entity which should have created such a singularity, should have come into existence?
Don’t you think it could have been designed only by some omniscient entity such as “God”?
(ii) The fact that we don’t know whether as much as almost 99.9999999% of the energy produced by all stars of the universe that escapes the periphery of the universe goes to waste or gets recycled
Though it is quite startling, not even 0.00000001% of the energy produced by all stars of the universe gets trapped on its way till it leaves the periphery of the universe, as shown in the following diagram in the case of our Sun.
Though this diagram shows how insignificant the fraction of the energy produced by the Sun that falls on its planets is, a question arises — does the un-intercepted energy get recycled or keep on travelling endlessly?
I described not only the way we may calculate the percentage of the energy that is not intercepted by the planets of the stars or any other bodies in my post https://medium.com/@subhashchandrasawhney/misconception-about-the-omnipotence-of-god-aeab101ea803, I have also told that if we assume that the rays of all stars of the universe which are not intercepted by any celestial body of the entire universe, keep on travelling endlessly, it in a way — implies that bulk of the energy produced by all the stars of the universe goes waste.
As I have calculated in this post, as much as 62.69 x 1⁰⁶⁰ KW of energy produced by all stars of the universe has not been intercepted. So it has already gone down the drain since the evolution of the universe, assuming the age of the universe as 26.7 billion years.
Don’t you think the entity that should have been able to create such a big universe, could not have been so incapable that He would have not done something to avoid perennial wastage of so much energy?
If we presume that He would not have been so stupid; we should not mind assuming that He may have ensured that the rays that escape the universe may get converted into what may be regarded as “Clouds of Dark Matter”.
I doubt if science can ever ascertain whether the rays that escape the universe keep on travelling farther and farther, even beyond the periphery of the universe, or get converted into any such envelope of clouds.
If I am not mistaken, science has not even envisaged such a possibility until now.
(iii) The phenomenon related to the Sinusoidal Path traced by the Sun
Now look at the following image.
It shows how the Sun climbs above and sinks below the galactic plane as it goes around our galaxy’s black hole.
Though we know that the Sun climbs above and sinks below the galactic plane as it goes around the black hole of our galaxy, do you think — it is enough to know that it traces a sinusoidal path?
Is it not necessary to also know why it follows a sinusoidal path?
The Sun may climb above the galactic plane only if some other galaxy above our galaxy may pull it upward with more force than the gravitational pull exerted by our galaxy on it to pull it downward.
Likewise, when it dips below the galactic plane, it may dip only if some other galaxy or some other universe situated below our galaxy pulls it downward with more force than the gravitational pull exerted by our galaxy on it to pull it upward.
Although it has not been possible to ascertain whether the energy produced by all stars of the universe gets converted into an envelope of clouds of dark matter around the universe as stipulated by me — we may even infer that instead of expecting the existence of any universes or galaxies above or beneath our universe — we may conclude that the envelope of dark matter may be surrounding the universe which may be pulling the Sun upward as well as below our the galactic plane.
But guess how long our astronomers or scientists may take to check whether some universes or some galaxies, or some envelope of dark matter, may be surrounding our universe.
Suppose, they may take about 1000 years to check it; we may assume that science may not be able to deem itself as an omniscient entity before one thousand years.
But wait …
Do we not get an inkling that science may not have been able to make any headway in these mysterious fields only because the entity which may have designed the human brain may haveOmniscient Entitydesigned only such brain that does not enable us to know such things as “How to produce every type of thing from nothing?”
I HOPE IT EXPLAINS WHY INSTEAD OF TREATING THE SCIENCE OF PHYSICALLY IMPERCEPTIBLE ENTITIES AS A PART OF COSMOLOGY OR ASTRO-PHYSICS — IT MAY BE TREATED AS A PART OF “APPLIED ONTOLOGY” OR SOME OTHER NAME MAY BE ASSIGNED TO IT IN THE SAME WAY AS NEW NAMES HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED TO ALL OTHER NEW BRANCHES OF SCIENCE.[1]
_______________________