The need of developing a system which may save the new ideas published by various authors in their books which do not sell — from getting wiped out of the memory of the world
If we may classify the books authored by various authors around the world as “Books written to entertain people”, “Books written with the intention of Self Help and Self Improvement” and “Books written to apprise people about new thoughts that come into their mind so that they do not get wiped out of the memory of the world” — I am writing this post about the books of the third type, which do not register any sale.
Though the people who write such books take a sigh of relief that once they have published such books, the world shall come to know about the new ideas that had struck them — it is not necessarily so.
Though nobody could have come to know about the new ideas that may have struck them if they did not write down such ideas in the form of books — they forget that people shall In the case of science books, just think — who loses the most if nobody reads them?
Only “science” and the “world” — not the “author”!
So a question arises — why people do not buy all such books.
It may be due to the following reasons.
1. They may be thinking that unless the author is at least a PhD in science, there is no use of reading such books.
2. They may not be taking the trouble of reading even the blurb or the preface of the books write by the non-PhDs.
This is exactly what happened in the case of my recent science book “Revolutionizing Science: Uncovering the Potential of Science’s Untapped Territory”.
Though it was published a few months back, nobody has given a positive response to it.
Maybe — because I am not a PhD in science!
Do you think same ideas that had struck me may strike somebody else also in future?
Very bleak chance!
So who is the loser?
Is there any agency in the world which may be recording somewhere the ideas given by such authors in the books written by them which do not register any sale?
None — to the best of my knowledge!
So if the same ideas are published by someone else in future, can anybody know that someone has already published such ideas in the past?
In my previous post “The step proposed to be taken by the International Association of Scientists to keep a record of even the discoveries mentioned in the books which don’t get sold” on medium.com, I proposed that it would be better if the International Association of Scientists may create a wing which may, not only, archive a few copies of all such science books in which their authors may have advanced some innovative ideas but may keep a record of all such ideas so that they do not get lost if nobody may buy even a single copy of such books.
I am citing below two such stipulations which have been advanced by me in this book, which shall go down the drain if the International Association of Scientists or any other such agency does not archive a few copies of such books since nobody has taken the trouble of reading this book until now.
Until now, the world does not know about these stipulations because nobody has read this book, until now.
JUST HAVE A LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING INNOVATIVE STIPULATIONS WHICH SHALL GET PERMANENTLY LOST BECAUSE, AT PRESENT, NO SUCH AGENCY EITHER ARCHIVES ANY COPIES OF SUCH BOOKS OR KEEPS A TRACK OF SUCH STIPULATIONS.
The stipulation about the reason why water expands instead of contracting, when its temperature falls below 4°C, in a much better way than the way it is stipulated until now
I have taken the following pleas to explain why water behaves in a way quite different from the way all other liquids behave, in the second chapter of the book.
The reason should be hidden behind the fact that its molecules happen to be “bipolar” and the fact that when the temperature of water falls below 4°C, it starts changing from a “liquid state” into a “solid state”.
The molecules of the things which expand when we heat them — are not bipolar?
So a question arises — is it not obvious that if water expands when its temperature falls below 4°C, it should have something to do with the bipolarity of its molecules only?
Though water is made up of two hydrogen (H) atoms and one oxygen (O) atom — it is bipolar, because its molecules have a slightly positive charge on the side (where hydrogen atoms are attached) and a slightly negative charge on the side oxygen atom is attached.
I don’t think it calls for someone to have a PhD in science to know that if something changes its state from a liquid state to a solid state — it should need some extra energy for such transformation.
Obviously, the molecules may derive such energy — from within themselves.
ACCORDING TO ME, THE MOMENT WATER SUCKS SUCH ENERGY FROM WITHIN THE MOLECULES; IT MUST BE OFFERING MORE FREEDOM TO THE MOLECULES TO SPREAD OUT BY GETTING REALIGNED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THEY GET JUXTAPOSED WITH “THEIR NORTH POLARITY FACING EACH OTHER” OR “THEIR SOUTH POLARITY FACING EACH OTHER”.
Just think — what would happen if the molecules get juxtaposed with their N-polarity facing the N-polarity of the adjacent molecules or their S-polarity facing the S-polarity of the adjacent molecules? If they get juxtaposed facing N-N or S-S polarities of each other — they shall repel each other and shall spread out.
It lets us conclude that since water indeed expands when its temperature falls below 4°C — it should be also true that when the temperature of water falls below 4°C, its molecules must be getting juxtaposed with identical polarities facing each other.
Though it explains why water expands when its temperature falls below 4°C, it also explains that at a temperature above 4°C, molecules of water occupy less space because — though some adjacent molecules may be facing identical polarities, most of them may be facing only opposite polarities.
The other stipulation explains how we may decipher the type of radiation to which a droplet of water may have been exposed and the type of sap which may have been added to it before exposing it to any such radiation by analyzing the shape acquired by it since when a droplet of water spreads over a wet mount slide — the shape acquired by it after it dries up depends on the type of radiation to which it may have been exposed and the type of the sap which may have been added to it before exposing it to any such radiation.
Though it has been confirmed that the shape acquired by the droplets after they dry up depends on the type of radiation to which it may have been exposed and the type of the sap which may have been added to it before exposing it to any such radiation, no work has been done to decipher the type of radiation to which they may have been exposed and the type of the type of sap which may have been added to them before exposing them to any such radiation so far.
For instance, look at the following shapes the droplets acquire when the type of radiation to which they may have been exposed and the type of sap which may have been added to them before exposing them to any such radiation.
This image has been reproduced from the book “Water and its Memory: New astonishing insights in water research” coauthored by Dr. Bernd Kröplin and Regine C. Henschel.
I have given several tips which may be useful to pursue such research in the fourteenth chapter of my book which, are summarized below.
IN THE SAME WAY, AS WE DON’T SAY THAT IT IS UNSCIENTIFIC TO DECIPHER A SCRIPT OF SOME ANCIENT LANGUAGE — WE SHOULD ALSO NOT SAY THAT IT MAY BE UNSCIENTIFIC TO DECIPHER HOW WATER MOLECULES RESPOND WHEN THEY GET EXPOSED TO VARIOUS SHAPES OF THINGS OR VARIOUS TYPES OF RADIATIONS OR DIFFERENT TYPES OF SOUND WAVES.
Though I have not deciphered any ancient script in my life, I felt like giving the following tips which may help decipher such logographs/logograms.
As we know, the shape of the sample of the water taken in a dropper is not the same as the shape of the droplet of the water which is dropped from the dropper on a wet mount slide and the shape of the droplet when it spreads out on the flat surface of the slide — we may infer that any data that gets registered into the memory of water, gets registered in three different ways.
(i) The way it gets registered before its sample is taken in a dropper and when it is held in a dropper
(ii) The way it gets registered when it takes the shape of a spherical droplet when it is dropped on the wet mount strip
(iii) The way it gets registered when the droplet spreads out on the flat surface of the slide.
The way, we record data in the binary form using two alphabets — “o-bit” and “1-bit” and record anything written in English using a set of 26 alphabets; water may be also using some types of alphabets as has been explained by me hereunder, with the help of the following diagram of a water molecule.
Though we don’t know — how the audio or video data gets recorded, let us assume that it may be getting recorded on a pattern of the following type until experimental scientists find out whether water, at all, uses any type of alphabets, or not.
Let us assume that water may be using the following types of alphabets.
First alphabet …. when a molecule may be resting on the flank “ABE”.
Second alphabet …. when a molecule may be resting on the flank “ACD”.
Third alphabet …. when a molecule may be resting on the flank “ADE”.
Let us also assume that
(i) It may be AUDIO DATA, if a molecule may be resting on the flank “BCDE”.
(ii) It may be VIDEO DATA, if two adjacent molecules may be resting on the flank “BCDE”.
In the same way, as Japanese and Chinese languages are written along vertical lines from top to bottom, beginning from the right side of the paper toward the left side of the paper, Urdu or Arabic is written along horizontal lines from the right side toward the left side and English or French is written along horizontal lines from the left side toward the right side — we may presume that the molecules of water may be reacting by the way they may be getting oriented along annular tracks of different radii.
IT AUGURS THAT ONCE SCIENCE DECIPHERS THE SCRIPT, WE MAY BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT SORT OF THING MAY HAVE BEEN IMMERSED IN THE WATER OR TO WHAT TYPE OF RADIATION OR SOUND WAVES WATER MAY HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED — BY LOOKING AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DROPLETS TAKEN UNDER A DARK FIELD MICROSCOPE.
Any doubt, since not even a single copy of my book has been read by anybody so far, the world shall not come to know about the tips given by me in this book?
SO IS IT NOT NECESSARY THAT SOME INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION SUCH AS THE “INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTISTS” STARTS ARCHIVING A FEW COPIES OF ALL SUCH SCIENCE BOOKS BUT ALSO STARTS KEEPING A CLASSIFIED RECORD OF ALL INNOVATIVE STIPULATIONS PICKED UP FROM THE BOOKS WHICH DO NOT REGISTER ANY SALE, UNDER ITS SAFE CUSTODY?