The terminology we may use for the science of the things which do not exist physically

Although it has been discovered that even things such as Dark Matter and Dark Energy also exist, I am surprised — how we may call the science of the things which do not exist physically — physics.

Should we not stop calling the science of such things also as physics?

Though we call the science of biological creatures Biology, the science of the botanical things Botany; does it make sense to call the science of the things which do not exist physically — physics?

Don’t you think we should look for some new word for the science of such things?

Although it is for the linguists to coin new words, may I take the liberty of suggesting that we may call the branch of the science related to the things that do not physically exist — “Theologics”, derived from the word “Theology”?

Although it has not occurred to anybody to look for some new word for the science of the things which do not exist physically.

Though, presently, this science may relate to only Dark Matter and Dark Energy but it may as well cover the science related to not only sub-consciousness, sooner or later — this branch of science may cover the science related to the entities known as God and the souls, as well.

Of course, the type of God that may be acknowledged as God may not be the same entity which is known as God by theists worldwide, if I am not wrong — sooner or later, science may acknowledge the existence of the entity defined by me as “God” in my recently published book “What May be Acknowledged as God”.

I have not only defined God as follows, in this book.

“God is an invisible entity, the brain of which should have been thousands of times more capable than the human brain and unlike us; should have known — how to create every type of thing from nothing.”

I have also described four such things in this book which could have been made possible only by an entity the brain of which should have been thousands of times more capable than the human brain.

Of course, since it is not an entity which may be keeping an eye on who is how cruel or inhuman or how righteous and generous someone is — science may like to distinguish such entity by some other name such as “Sci-God” instead of calling it “God”.

In this book, I have also thrown light on the reasons which should ultimately compel science to acknowledge the existence of the entity known as souls, as well, in which case — the science related to the souls may also be covered by the same branch of science which may cover the science related to Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

Is it not true that until it had not been discovered that invisible things known as Dark Matter and Dark Energy that do not exist physically, science has been very vehemently insisting that it was wrong to think that even anything which may not exist physically may also exist?

But has it not come around such a concept now?

So believe me, sooner or later — the wheel will urn 360° around, as shown in the following diagram.