Sitemap

Things Science doesn’t know but may know through Deductive Reasoning

5 min readJul 8, 2025

Since science has admitted that things such as “Dark Matter” and “Dark Energy” are also supposed to exist, the existence of which, may be proved only through “Deductive Reasoning”, in no other way — is anything unscientific in acknowledging the existence of all other things the existence of which may also be proved only though “Deductive Reasoning”, in no other way?

If so, don’t you think it is not unscientific to acknowledge the existence of the following types of entities, too — the existence of which may be proved only through “Deductive Reasoning”, in no other way?

THE ENTITIES FOR WHICH IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE TO DEVELOP THE FOLLOWING TYPE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Though geneticists have been able to study, threadbare, the sequence in which various parts of the human fetus grow from the day of conception onward, I am surprised why it not occur to them that it should not have been possible for any cell to go beyond the stage of the zygote unless it comes to know

(a) How many cells of which type have to be created by it?

(b) How are cells of each type created by it?

(c) On which part of the fetus, the cells created by it have to be grafted?

Does it not imply that some information system should be feeding such information to them?

In my following book, I have told that since some system must be passing on such information to the cells of the fetuses during the entire spans of gestation — some entities should have developed such information systems for all types of creatures who get born after the fertilization of the female eggs in the fallopian tubes — in the same way as human species get born.

So far as I think, such information may be carried on by the cells of the amniotic fluids fed to the fetuses through the umbilical cord that is connected to the fetuses in the same manner in which it is connected in the case of the human fetus.

The following photo shows the way the umbilical cord is connected to the human fetus.

Human Umbilical Cord (Source: Stanford Medicne)

Of course, though such information may be getting transmitted to the cells through the amniotic fluids, it may never be possible for us to know the format in which such information may be getting inscribed on the cells of the amniotic fluids.

BUT NOTHING PREVENTS US FROM REALIZING THAT THIS TYPE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS COULD HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED BY SOME SUPERHUMAN ENTITIES ONLY BECAUSE IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE FOR ANY SYSTEM ENGINEER EVEN TODAY TO DEVELOP SUCH SYSTEMS ON ANY COMPUTER SINCE EVEN IN THE CASE OF HUMAN SPECIES, IT INVOLVES PROGRAMMIUNG OF AS MANY AS 300 TRILLION CELLS OF AS MANY AS 300 TYPES.

THE ENTITIES WHICH MAY BE ENABLING PEOPLE TO TELL THINGS RELATED TO THEIR PAST LIFE

No doubt, everybody is unable to recount the incidents of their past life, but several people have been able to narrate the incidents of their past life till the age of about fifteen years.

Even if there may be only a few hundred people who may have been able to tell the name of the city where they lived during their past life, the names of their parents, brothers and other close relatives as well as other incidents of their past life, such instances prompt us to think — how it should have been possible especially because some of such cases don’t relate to remote past.

I have narrated a real story of a lady who had lost her life in a car accident and is presently studying in America, and a few other similar stories in the second part of the book, mentioned above.

In this book, I have also told that it could not have been possible for anyone of them to have told all such things unless some entities may be capturing such memories at the time of their death, uploading such memories on some type of servers and downloading such memories into the memory of such persons when they get reborn.

I am not the only person who has talked about such a possibility.

Dr. Ian Stevenson and his team had documented more than a thousand cases of reincarnation.

These stories justify the existence of souls much in the same way as the existence of Dark Matter and Dark Energy has been justified by the astronomers based on Deductive Reasoning by arguing that because unless it is assumed that such things exist — it is not possible to explain the following phenomena even though it is not possible to prove their existence physically.

(a) Why is the universe expanding at a much faster rate than the rate at which it was expanding in the past?

(b) Why do the stars closer to the black holes of our galaxy travel at more or less same speed as the stars situated near its rim?

Though science may not be able to know the type of the servers on which such entities may be uploading such memories, it is very rude on the part of science not to have given its assent to the existence of the souls.

Maybe science has not taken an interest in what is known as “Theory of Reincarnation” only because it does not form a part of any existing branch of science.

But if so, don’t you think — it should have created some new branch of science to cover the topics related to the concept of reincarnation?

THE ENTITY WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN CAPABLE OF CREATING PREMORDIAL SOUP FROM NOTHING

Though it is speculated that what is known as “primordial soup” of quarks and gluons, the fundamental building blocks of matter existing freely as quark-gluon plasma (QGP) in a state of extremely hot and dense matter, should have come into existence shortly after the Big Bang — we think that it could not have been possible since nothing is expected to have existed before the Big Bang only because we can’t produce anything from “nothing”.

But “How such soup should have come into existence?” may be explained in the following manner.

Since universe has come into existence, it leads us to conclude that such soup should have come into existence since if it would not have come into existence, the universe could not have come into existence and Big Bang should have occurred because if Big Bang would not have occurred such soup would not have come into existence which leads us to believe that it sh.

Of course, it raises a question: “How the Big Bang should have occurred?” — which may be answered in the following manner.

IN THE SAME WAY AS OUR BRAIN HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED TO KNOW FROM WHERE THE SUPERHUMAN ENTITIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE DEVELOPED THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS RELATED TO GENETICS SHOULD HAVE ARRIVED AND HOW THE SOULS MAY BE COMMUNICATING WITH EACH OTHER FROM ONE CONTINENT TO ANOTHER CONTINENT, IT HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED TO KNOW EVEN THINGS SUCH AS “HOW BIG BANG SHOULD HAVE OCCURRED AND HOW PREMORDIAL SOUP SHOULD HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE FROM NOTHING?” IN THE SAME WAY — AS OUR EYES HAVE NOT BEEN DESIGNED TO SEE EVERY TYPE OF THING.

--

--

Subhash Chandra Sawhney
Subhash Chandra Sawhney

Written by Subhash Chandra Sawhney

A mechanical engineer. Has worked on MIS for about 30 years. Lives in India. Has authored 8 books. May be contacted at subhashchandrasawhney@gmail.com

No responses yet